
Head Office:
Southern Regional Office:
Regional Bases:
Air tightness – the resistance of the building envelope to inward or outward air leakage. Excessive air leakage results in increased energy consumption and a drafty cold building. Air leakage is driven by differential pressures, across the building envelope. The mechanisms that create these differences in pressure are the combined effects of – stack (internal warm air rises), external wind (inducing +ve and –ve pressures on the envelope) and mechanical ventilation systems.
Note – Part L1 applies to dwellings, Part L2 to non – domestic buildings. Part L1A and L2A refer to new buildings and L1B and L2B to refurbishments.
The Government is committed to reduce CO2 emissions from energy consumption by 20% by the year 2010. The majority of buildings constructed today consume more energy than necessary. Two major factors in the design and performance of building fabric which affect energy consumption are, air leakage and continuity of insulation.
There are also substantial commercial benefits to building owners that will accrue over the life time of the building. Reduced energy costs provide clients with real cash incentives to achieve airtight buildings. Other benefits are gained from increased comfort for building users, office staff and / or customers. Although difficult to total, these are tangible benefits to the client.
Air Tightness testing became a requirement under Part L in April 2002 with a recent update in April 2006. Now, all buildings that pass through the planning and building control processes have to comply with Part L. The Government is looking to tighten up the regulations and further updates are due in 2010. European Legislation has also been enacted, tightening the use of energy in buildings. This was introduced in January 2006 through the European Performance In Buildings Directive.
All parties involved on the project from the client, contractor and consultants
to all site staff and operatives and off site suppliers need to understand
the concepts of air tightness and how they affect the part of the project
they are involved with. It only takes one part of the building to be leaky
to ensure a failure to comply, which can lead to costly remedial works
and time delays. A real effort needs to be made to educate everyone involved
and ensure that a team effort is made.
ALL buildings require designs to
incorporate ‘robust details’ to ensure air tightness, continuity of insulation
and potential problems with thermal bridging are addressed.
For non domestic
buildings, carry out an air leakage pressure test to ATTMA TS1.
For buildings < 500
m² gross floor area, assume an air permeability rate of 15 to calculate
the BER or carry out an air tightness test.
Remember that the maximum air
permeability rate is 10 m³/h/m² at 50 Pascals. However,
the air permeability target may have been set tighter so that the carbon
rating is met!!
Key Changes For New Commercial Buildings Part L2A
Obtaining compliance is now a five-step procedure.
Designers will need to:
Show a home’s predicted CO2 emission rate will not be greater than the target emission rate.
Ensure the performance of the building’s fabric, heating, hot water and lighting meets the minimum values set out in the document.
Introduce passive measures to prevent homes overheating.
Ensure construction is consistent with the design.
Provide the occupier with information to order to allow the building to be operated as efficiently as possible.
2 Dwellings will have to be pressure tested
The air permeability of the envelope should be no greater than 10m³/h/m².
3. Dwellings will have to produce 20% less CO2 than
they do under the existing regulations.
A carbon comparison must be produced to show how a home’s predicted CO2 emission rate compares to target emission rating based on a national dwelling, compliant with the 2002 regulations. A fuel factor can be applied to the rating if LGP, oil mains electricity or solid fuel is used, making it easier to comply when using these fuels than their carbon content would otherwise allow. So, with careful design, electric heating can still be used in apartment blocks.
4. There are two routes to compliance for apartments.
A penthouse does not have to comply with the carbon emission rate provided
the remaining dwellings can compensate, since the compliance for apartment
blocks can be demonstrated either as individual SAP calculations for
each dwelling or as an area-weighted average for all dwellings in the
building.
5. A report should be provided to Building Control
This will identify the features that deliver the CO2 reduction. At completion,
additional schedules covering lighting, robust details and non-accredited
details are required, together with evidence that air permeability standards
have been achieved, systems have been commissioned and operating instructions
issued.
1. More work is subject to the regulations
The rules will apply to: an extension, a change of use or alteration, provision
of a controlled fitting or service and a provision of a thermal element.
2. The route to compliance for an extension has not changed
The elemental route to compliance remains for extensions and cases where
the use of a building has changed.
3. Individual elements must meet specific standards
Provisions apply to acceptable performance standards for windows, heating
and hot water systems, lighting, insulation of pipes, ducts and mechanical
cooling systems, commissioning and the provision of information.
4. Entire elements may need to be upgraded
When 25% of a thermal element, such as a roof is upgraded, the entire element
should be upgraded to the latest elemental standards if pay back for
the work can be achieved within 15 years. If not, it should be upgraded
to a standard that does achieve payback within that time.
5. Historic buildings
Energy efficiency measures should be incorporates where they will not prejudice
the character of the building.
1. Obtaining compliance is now a five step procedure
The predicted building CO2 emission rate should be no greater than the target rate.
The performance of the building fabric, heating and hot water and lighting should comply with the minimum limits in the document
Passive measures should be included to prevent overheating for areas without cooling.
The building should be built as designed.
Provision should be made to enable energy efficient operation.
2. Air Permeability
Tests are required for every building that incorporates a floor area greater
than 500m²
3. Overheating
Designers must demonstrate that the combined solar and casual heat gains
do not exceed W/m² or that the temperature does not exceed 28C for more
than 20 hours a year spaces with no comfort cooling.
4. Fully glazed buildings will comply
A typical mechanically cooled and ventilated building, 40% glazed and built
to 2002 standards can comply through a combination of omission of roof
lights, improvement in double glazing specification and lighting controls.
An equivalent building with 100% glazed facade could comply with a similar
improvement strategy, but with an additional improvement in the chillier
seasonal efficiency.
5. Calculating energy consumption
Two calculations are required: a preliminary one, as part of the design
commission, and a final calculation demonstrating compliance based on ‘as
constructed’ information, incorporating any performance changes
made during construction.
1. More work carried out to existing buildings is subject to the
regulations
An extension, material change of use, material alteration, the provision
or extension of a controlled service or fitting and the renovation of a
thermal element are all now subject to the regulations.
2. Consequential improvements
Work to existing heating or cooling systems, windows or walls below the
element standards must be upgraded, provided it is technically, functionally
and economically feasible.
3. The 10% rule
The requirement for consequential work is limited to 10% of the value of
the principle works. The following elements are all subject to the 10%
rule: any heating, cooling or air handling system older than 15 years
should be replaces by new plant and improved controls; any inefficient
lighting system serving more than 100m² should be upgraded; energy metering
should be installed; and if the renewable energy contribution is less
than 100%, the system upgraded provided payback is less then seven years.
4. Extensions
Elemental standards are given for the building fabric and windows in extensions.
There is some flexibility allowed, provided the heat loss for area weighted
U-values is no greater than the equivalent compliant extension. Extensions
over 100m² and greater than 25% of the floor area of the existing part
of the building come under Approved Document L2A
5. Controlled fittings or services
Compliance is largely elemental, with specific minimum standards to be achieved. There are additional requirements governing commissioning, the provision of the sub-meters and log books.

The Part L regulations implemented in April 2006, state that all air tests
must be carried out by ‘suitably qualified’ companies such as those accredited
by ATTMA – Air Tightness Testing Measurement Association. Membership is
only gained by those companies who hold UKAS accreditation for carrying
out the tests. UKAS accreditation ensures that all equipment is calibrated,
staff trained and procedures documented. Using a company such as HRS, who
are full members of ATTMA, ensures clients can have confidence that Building
Control/Approved Inspectors will accept the air test result. It also means
that HRS can negotiate on behalf of their client if dispensation is required
on any part of the project.
Use the check list below to identify whether
the test is being carried out correctly.
Calibration of the air test rig, (not just the fan) has been carried out, within last 12 months, to BS 848 |
|
Calibration of all measurement equipment has been carried out, within last 12 months, to UKAS standards. |
|
Check the envelope area calculations refer to the whole building
envelope and that this is the envelope that has been actually tested. Check that the test has been carried out on the same envelope criteria – ie no areas have been excluded for the test and included in the calculations. |
|
The whole building should be tested wherever possible - Not only is the result more accurate but it increases the chance of the test passing and gaining compliance. If areas have been excluded, are the reasons valid? |
|
Check that temporary sealing has only been applied to H and V equipment and other permanently open natural ventilations. |
|
During the air test, if possible be inside the building and check-
|
|
Ambient conditions – wind speed should ideally be a maximum 13 mph |
|
The following readings and values should be checked. Any readings outside the parameters detailed below indicate the test has been carried out incorrectly and the test should be carried out again.
|
|
Commercial Benefits to the Building Owner and Client.
One reason only – there are substantial commercial benefits to having an airtight building and retailers are accruing those benefits for the life time of the building stock.
A typical example of the real benefits that can be realised was seen on an existing retail store that was sealed in February 1997. The ambient temperature in the store was raised by 5°C, after the store had been air sealed.
Typical air permeability rates of 3 m³/h/m² have been obtained on new retail stores and 5 m³/h/m² on existing stores. These levels of air tightness have been achieved by incremental improvement over a number of years and effort by all parties involved with the projects.
The additional costs to clients on new build retail stores is < 0.5% of the total spend.
The real benefits obtained from achieving a good level of air tightness can be summarised as;
Lower energy costs for the life time of the building
Lower initial capital costs due to down sizing of plant and equipment
Air tightness tests can act as performance tests for fire compartments as well as external envelopes
The environment within the building becomes less drafty and potentially warmer. Productivity of staff could be raised significantly - a happy worker is a productive worker!
The risk of interstitial condensation within the building fabric is minimised, if the building fabric is built to an air tightness standard. Degradation should therefore be reduced in the long term.
Different types of buildings require different levels of air tightness. Air conditioned buildings should be tighter than naturally ventilated ones. Archives, cold rooms and museums will all require to be much tighter to ensure the specification levels for the control of humidity, heat loss and the ingress of pollutants are met.
Good Practice Guidelines for Different Building Types
The following figures are recommended air tightness specifications for
various building types as set out in CIBSE TM 23.
| Air leakage index | Air Permeability |
m³/h/m² at 50 Pa |
||
| Practice | Good |
Best |
Good |
Best |
| Building Type | ||||
| Office - naturally ventillated | 10.0 |
5.0 |
7.0 |
3.5 |
| Offices - balanced mech vent. | 5.0 |
2.5 |
3.5 |
2.0 |
| Superstores | 5.0 |
2.0 |
3.0 |
1.5 |
| Industrial | 15.0 |
3.5 |
10.0 |
2.0 |
| Dwellings | 15.0 |
8.0 |
10.0 |
5.0 |
Theory Of Air Tightness, Air Leakage and Air Sealing Measures
Air tightness / air permeability (air leakage) – defined as the resistance
of the building envelope to inward or outward air permeation. Air leakage
is driven by pressure differentials between inside and outside a building
caused by the wind, stack effect and mechanical ventilation systems. Excessive
air leakage leads to increased energy consumption, increased drafts within
the building and increased risks of condensation within the building fabric.
For the client, air leakage is physically felt with cold drafts caused
by the uncontrolled movement of air into or out of a building. Cold drafts
usually cause complaints from building users!!
Air barrier or air seal line – the
physical components that make up the airtight envelope of the building.
The air barrier needs to be continuous around the whole envelope – roof,
walls and ground floors, durable and maintainable in the long term. The
air seal line should be drawn on construction drawings to communicate the
strategy to all relevant parties.
Air tightness test or air leakage pressure
test – the building is pressure tested by connecting a fan and measuring
the airflow rates required to keep the building at various positive or
negative pressures.
Air permeability – expressed as the amount of air leakage
in cubic metres, per hour, per square metre of envelope at a nominal pressure
differential of 50 Pascals, between inside and outside the building envelope.
Q50 – air
flow rate required to pressurise the building envelope to 50 Pascals, measured
unit - cubic metres per second.
Ensure that all materials and components used for air tightness purposes have a similar specification and longevity, as all others used on the project. There is no reason that buildings constructed to an airtight standard should be stuffy for occupiers or be at greater risk from condensation. The rule is; build tight – ventilate right.
No. Part L is meant to control the amount of uncontrolled air leakage through the building fabric, not the amount of controlled ventilation.
The target air permeability rate of 10 m³/h/m², set down in Part L is achievable when current best practice for buildings is around 2 m³/h/m². However, if no regard is taken to air tightness, it is probable that Part L will not be complied with.
Additional building costs may amount to 0.5%. This ignores cost savings from down sizing heating plant and the life time reduction in energy costs.
When a party claims that air leakage problems will be sorted out after the first air leakage test and will be remedied then. HRS’s golden rule is that it costs considerably more to put right second time, rather than doing it right first time. Ensure that maintenance procedures take air tightness into account. Degradation or damage to air tight elements or components needs to be minimised over the long term. We have witnessed how simple it is for an electrician to punch a large hole through a wall, thereby increasing the air permeability figure significantly enough for users of the building to complain about an increase in drafts.
Designing airtight buildings is the only means of ensuring long term,
low air leakage performance. Build tight – ventilate right. The objective
is to minimise uncontrolled air leakage whilst maintaining controlled ventilation.
Ensure the air barrier is based on structural elements, wherever possible.
Condensation risk will be minimised if the air barrier or seal envelope
is correctly positioned, which depends on the make up of the construction
element itself. Generally, it should be placed on the warm side of the
insulation layer. It is also important for the insulation layer to be continuous
and to bear in mind that excessive cold air moving around loose or misplaced
insulation can lead to interstitial condensation.
Ensure that the air tightness
test is carried out by a member of the ATTMA – Air Tightness Test Measurement
Association. The DCLG recognises members as being ‘suitably qualified’ and ‘competent’ companies
to carry out air tests.
Careful consideration is needed on all structural elements. For instance pre-cast concrete floors may look airtight, but consider air leakage along open voids through the slab into cavities in external walls! Also think about non-structural elements such as roof liner sheets or T and G boarding. A 1mm gap along each joint adds up to a considerable area for air to leak through.
The Stationery Office – Dwellings
MCRMA
SEDA
BRE Good Building Guides
Kingspan
Any supplier of materials or components who can not state the air leakage rate (permeability) of their product per meter square, as tested to BS / EN standards. Beware material suppliers who states their components are air tight. NO materials are perfectly airtight, particularly after installation on site!
Using dry lining or vapour barrier as the air barrier is possible with
good detailing. However, a high level of site supervision is required
to ensure all junctions are air tight and that the lining is not damaged.
Perforated liner sheets are NOT suitable as an air seal line.
If you have any concerns, request that the material or component under goes an air leakage test. NOTE HRS Services can undertake tests on components on or off site, to the relevant BS or EN.
Ensure that good, sound building practice is delivered so that the building
is airtight. If the building is not airtight, the air permeability target
of 10 m3/h/m2 will be exceeded. The end user (– client) may also find that
ventilation is inadequate and may complain of drafts at times of the year
when the building is difficult to heat or cool.
State clearly in all pricing
enquiries the air tightness specification and ask for details of compliance
including specifications, method statements, quality audits, etc, etc.
Ensure a person on site is nominated to control and audit all aspects of
air tightness works, through out the contract period on site. Do not enclose
or cover cavities or gaps before the air tightness works have been quality
assured.
Use similar methods to those used at present to control all aspects of contracts specification, method statements, quality management systems, etc. Problems generally occur when responsibilities for each element or package of work are not clearly defined and agreed, prior to site work starting.
If the air leakage test fails, how can air leakage paths be found? A variety of techniques can be used to identify leakage paths – these include;
Feeling for drafts adjacent to the air barrier, whilst the building is being air leakage pressure tested. It is useful if the air test fan unit can pressurise and de-pressurise buildings so that drafts can be felt for on both the internal and external faces of the air barrier.
Running localised smoke tests using a hand held smoke generator.
Running a smoke test on the whole building and recording the results on video.
Carrying out a thermographic survey
Physically checking over the risk areas looking for holes, gaps, etc
Apart from the obvious - unsealed block work, hollow concrete beams or floor planks, joints/junctions in curtain walling and dry lining systems, hollow frames/mullions/transoms, hollow steel sections penetrating the roof or walls, lap joints on roof liner sheets or T & G boarding - to name a few!
Dividing Q50 by 5.5 gives an approximate figure for the total leakage area in metres square. For example; if Q50 = 37 m³/s the total leakage area = 6.7 m². Treat this figure with respect and care as the visual hole seen on the air seal line is not always the actual area that air is ultimately leaking from – the final leakage hole could be a lot smaller.
Any sub contract package is proposing to use gaffer tape or plastic sheeting to air seal works. Can we do the air leakage test next Tuesday, if the roof plant comes tomorrow and the fitters come in on Sunday to install it? NO! Plan ahead and ensure the building is ready for the test. Ensure the size – flow rate of the fan is adequate for the job. Ask for calculations to back this up.
Ventilate right – the main contractor should build the envelope tight. This will enable the design, specification and sizing of the heating and ventilation system to be carried out with confidence. Fresh air openings in the envelope constitute massive air leakage paths and will ensure buildings fail the air test. Check the envelope area is correct - for obvious reasons.
ATTMA TS1 & BS EN 13829:2001(1) Thermal Performance of Buildings: Determination of air permeability of buildings – Fan pressurisation method.
For a moderately sized single storey building which complies with Part L, Qleakage = <10 m³/h/m², the average ventilation rate will be approximately 0.3 ach. The ventilation rate in ach can be approximately estimated as A/(6*S) ach where A = Area of walls, roof and ground floor and S = area of walls and roof.
Qleakage = rCp * V * n / 3600 W/K where
rCp heat capacity of air, V volume of building m³ and n
is
the ventilation rate in air changes per hour - ach.
For an industrial building with a floor area of 5000 m2, currently built without air tightness considerations; air permeability can be > 14 m³/h/m². This equates to a hole in the roof of approximately 5 m²!!
If the air permeability can be reduced to 8 m³/h/m², which comfortably passes Part L, then the energy saving could equal > 60,000 kWh per annum. NOTE. Current best practice for industrial type buildings in regards of air tightness is an air permeability figure of 2 m³/h/m².
Services can be routed through ducts inside the building envelope. Sealing multiple service penetrations is awkward but similar principles to those used to seal penetrations through fire walls and plant room slabs should be used.
ATTMA TS1 states that the fan should be able of achieving > 80% of the required air flow rate at 50 Pascals pressure difference.
HRS Services are able to provide estimation for buildings heat loss associated with uncontrolled ventilation and associated costs and potential savings by altering designs. HRS have close links built up with Sheffield University staff and have access to a vast range of skills and laboratory resources. If HRS and Sheffield University can’t help you directly, HRS will certainly offer what advice we can.
Set our clearly in all documentation the level of air tightness that can be achieved and how it is to be practically achieved on site. Be specific about whose responsibility it is to seal components and also adjacent elements, including works on site. Show these details clearly on all contract and site drawings and ensure that specified materials and components are fit for purpose.
Ensure all site staff and operatives fully understand the concepts of air tightness and the details of how it is to be achieved on site. Ensure training is carried out for all the parties involved, including site operatives.
Components could be tested in laboratories or tested on site in specially built enclosures as specified in BS EN 12114:2000. The test method allows the air leakage through individual joints to be derived. From this information the building air leakage rate can be estimated by totalling up the leakage rates for all the joints in the building envelope.
As with all gaps and joints, there are many BS EN Standards which specify in detail, how they can be bridged effectively. Materials not to use include materials permeable to air (eg mineral fibre) or flimsy sheets, thin gaffer tapes or similar. Sealant, expanding foam and tapes can be used, if specified and applied correctly. Ensure that all materials and components are fit for purpose and installed to current standards.
If there is no information on air leakage rates for materials or components, there can be no confidence with the final performance on site. Obtain a component air leakage test – contact HRS for details. Many modern construction systems and designs rely on gaskets or sealants within the joint to seal the system. If these are not installed correctly during installation, the air leakage could be considerable.
A typical example is with block work. Well designed, specified and constructed block work can achieve a very good standard with air leakage < 2 m3/h/m2. However, without taking due regard can lead some block work walls to have high leakage rates - for a variety of reasons. Sometimes blocks are not specified with an air leakage rate and also the composition and leakage rates of identical blocks, manufactured in different plants, can vary significantly.
On site problems with quality of block work and mortar joints can lead to significant leakage. For example, where block work is concealed above suspended ceilings, vertical mortar joints – perps – may not be filled completely but ‘faced up’, which leak.
Note, HRS Services offer consultancy services to ensure that materials and components making up building elements comply with U and phi value regulations and air permeability constraints. HRS have the necessary experience, knowledge and testing equipment and software to provide answers to any technical queries you might have.Ensure that the air tightness test is carried out by a member of the ATTMA – Air Tightness Testing and Measurement Association. The DCLG recognises members as being ‘suitably qualified’ and/or ‘recognised qualifications’ to carry out air tests.
A building will fail Part L if the air permeability rate is > 10 m³/h/m². More stringent requirements may be in place, depending on the requirements within the building energy calculation to satisfy the carbon emissions target.
Buildings could also fail if thermographic inspections of the visible envelope, shows that insulation is not reasonably continuous.
ATTMA TS1 states that fan flow rates should be measured to ± 7%.
The accuracy of the air leakage pressure test itself will be affected by the strength and gustiness of the wind. The wind will impose both positive and negative pressures on the building envelope, which will vary during the test. ATTMA TS1 states that tests should normally only be carried out when wind speeds are below 6 m/s. Occasionally a test may have to be carried out in wind speeds above this. Decisions will be made on a job specific basis.
Use the same principles of design and construction as for other air tightness works but use fire rated materials. Compliance to various sections of Part L1 and L2 can be achieved by a ‘competent person’ reviewing the design and/or site works and deeming them adequate. These Sections include air tightness for buildings and continuity of insulation for all buildings. HRS can take on this role and issue the necessary declaration to the Building Control Officer.
HRS Services Ltd have air tightness testing equipment suitable for testing buildings with floor areas from 100 to 20,000 square metres. For small buildings HRS use their PORTAFAN systems which are 710 mm diameter fans which can be built into sets of up to 4 fans. These are electrically powered, quiet, clean and as the name suggests portable. They can easily test whole buildings or if necessary be erected inside buildings to test plenums, service ducts, fire compartments, upper storeys, extensions, etc, etc.
To test larger buildings HRS have developed the MIDIFAN and MEGAFAN systems which are 1.25m & 2m diameter fans respectively. Self powered, the MIDIFAN’s and MEGAFAN have been designed to test the largest buildings in the UK. The MEGAFAN is three times larger than any other testing rig in the UK. A major advantage of the unit is that it is self contained with all ancillary equipment including smoke testing equipment. When other air test companies state that they haven’t the equipment to test the building, you know where to come.Carry out the air tightness test when the building envelope is complete. Temporarily sealing areas of the building is not only difficult and costly to do well, but the risk of failing increases as well. It is far better to delay the test for a week rather than test early, fail, and then have to carry out another test in one weeks time.
Temporarily seal all heating and ventilation equipment and ensure window trickle ventilators are closed. Check all service ducts (including telephone, electric, spare ducts) and water and condensate traps are either sealed or full.
The worst acceptable standard for the leakage rate is < 10 m³/h/m²No. A heavy thunderstorm may impose pressures of 500 Pascals onto the building fabric.
A minimum of 4 hours should be allowed to carry out a test. It would take approximately 1-2 hours to temporarily seal services and set up the air tightness test equipment. If the air test runs smoothly, a maximum of 30 minutes is required; but it’s best to allow 1 hour. It takes approximately 1 hour to de-rig every thing. However, if an air test fails and multiple tests are carried out or the fan is left running to search for drafts and air leakage paths, then the air test can run on.
Yes, as long as no-one opens a door or access hatch which forms part of the air barrier – which basically allows the pressure to drop and the test would need to be run again.
No. However, the building needs to be empty of all people for Health and Safety reasons. It is also a good idea to inform the Fire Brigade to avoid unnecessary call outs. The smoke is a harmless food grade water based mono-propylene glycol (MPG), but it is a good idea not to expose fresh food or produce to it.
Q50 * 0.8. ATTMA TS1 states that the fan must be capable of achieving at least 80% of the required air volume flow rate, at 50 Pascals pressure difference – Q50. Q50 = A * 10 / 3600 m³/s where 10 is the Air Permeability target, A = Area of walls, roof and ground floor
Note. HRS SERVICES Portafan system can deliver from 1 - 18 m³/s and the megafan system 10 - 85 m³/s. Note HRS SERVICES are certified to ISO 9001:2000 and UKAS.
Ensure there is a minimum temperature differential between inside and outside the building of at least 10°C. This is usually achieved by leaving the heating system turned on inside the building for 12 – 24 hours prior to the survey.
Carry out external thermographic surveys after dark (or heavy cloud), to ensure problems with sunlight warming up external surfaces can be ignored. Ensure the weather is dry as moist surfaces play havoc with the survey results. Beware items of plant emitting heat inside a building, as they can affect the results.
A thermal image makes it easy to identify areas of missing, misplaced
or discontinuous insulation.
It can also be used to identify air leakage paths if used correctly. Cold air
leaking into a building will cause cold patches on the surrounding fabric, which
can be identified from thermal images.
No, but they provide a qualitative appreciation of the thermal properties of a building envelope, quickly over large areas and display the results graphically in colour. Spot temperatures are also measured which can allow for later analysis of the thermal performance of building envelopes.
A sound knowledge of construction technology (U values, emissivity of materials) allied with experience of on site defects is required to identify the true cause of faults identified on site. Particular care needs to be taken with regard to the emissivity and reflectivity of surfaces. Surfaces with low emissivity (eg polished steel), appear colder than their surroundings but are sensitive to reflective heat from background sources eg equipment, lights, people etc.
If the thermal image of the inside face of a building envelope appears to have a low surface temperature compared to their surroundings. Take care to evaluate the results as this could be caused by;
Missing or damaged insulation or maybe high levels of moisture within the building fabric
High levels of air leakage cooling the inside face
Thermal bridging
Evaporation of moisture from the internal surface
Cold rooms inside the building cooling the surroundings
Note HRS SERVICES have a thermographic camera able to detect temperatures from –10 to 800°C in 0.1 degree intervals. The images can be down loaded and stored and analysed at a later date by the client if required.
To ensure the air test is carried out to plan and the risk of failing is minimised, it is necessary for HRS and the client to work together. Once HRS receive an order, a procedure is set into train which ensures that everything swings into action. At least a week prior to the air test, HRS send clients a FAX back set of procedures which the client needs to confirm that they are ready to test.
The FAX back include the following points;
On the day of the air test HRS usually turn up mid morning and go through site induction procedures.
This is relatively simple, as the size of the fan determines how much air the fan can blow into the building in 1 second. The air blown in, equals the air leaking out and linking this to the requirements of Part L2 enables HRS to determine whether a PORTAfan, MIDIfan or MEGAfan is required.
Examples of air test rigs for different size buildings.
Building of 1000 m² floor area, assume 2 storeys, 20*25m on plan and average
10 m wall height.
Envelope area = Area of ground floor = 500
+ Area of roof = 500
+ Area of walls = 900
Envelope area = 1,900 m²
Assuming the building is just complying with Part L2 and is leaking at
10 m³.hour-1.m-² at 50 Pascals. The total volume of air leaking out of
the building = 1,900 * 10 = 19,000 m³.hour-1
= 5.3 m³.second-1
ATTMA TS1 states that the air test rig should provide a minimum of 80%
of the volume flow rate.
The air test rig must have a volume flow rate up to 80% of 5.3 m³.second-1,
4.24 m³.second-1
HRS PORTAfan air test has been calibrated to BS848 with a volume flow rate
between
